The UK’s latest car reliability rankings offer vehicle recyclers useful insight into which makes may stay on the road longer, where recycled parts demand could develop and how donor vehicle value may change. The findings highlight why reliability data, parc size and repair economics all matter when making dismantling and stock decisions.
Mercedes has been named the UK’s most reliable car manufacturer in the latest Auto Express Driver Power survey, with the results offering vehicle recyclers another useful indication of how different makes are performing as they age within the UK vehicle parc.
The 2026 Driver Power findings place Mercedes at the top of the reliability rankings with a score of 92.42%, ahead of Volvo on 91.43% and Mazda on 91.26%.
Honda and Toyota complete the top five, followed by Suzuki, Tesla, Skoda, Vauxhall and Peugeot.
Driver Power 2026 – most reliable manufacturers
- Mercedes – 92.42%
- Volvo – 91.43%
- Mazda – 91.26%
- Honda – 90.31%
- Toyota – 90.00%
- Suzuki – 89.74%
- Tesla – 89.40%
- Skoda – 88.94%
- Vauxhall – 88.76%
- Peugeot – 88.63%
Reliability rankings are not simply about identifying which cars are most or least likely to break down. They can also provide useful context when considering which vehicles are remaining economically viable for longer, where demand for replacement components may develop and which makes are becoming increasingly important within recycled parts inventories.
Reliable cars can still create strong parts demand
It might be tempting to assume that the most reliable manufacturers generate less demand for replacement components, but the relationship is considerably more complicated.
Vehicles with strong reliability reputations can remain on the road for many years. As those vehicles age, owners may be more willing to repair them rather than replace them, particularly where the underlying vehicle remains dependable and retains reasonable market value.
That can create opportunities for recyclers supplying lower-cost reclaimed components for accident damage, wear-related repairs and failures that may otherwise make an older vehicle uneconomic to repair using new parts.
Mercedes, Volvo, Toyota and Honda vehicles can therefore remain important donor vehicles even when their overall reliability is strong.
Availability, vehicle population, age, component values and repair costs are all likely to have a greater influence on recycled parts demand than a reliability percentage alone.
Tesla’s position reflects the changing recycling market
Tesla’s seventh-place position is particularly relevant as greater numbers of electric vehicles enter salvage, dismantling and end-of-life channels.
The increasing age of early EVs means recyclers are gaining more experience with high-voltage batteries, electric drive units, power electronics and the large number of electronic components fitted to these vehicles.
For professional dismantlers, the challenge is increasingly not simply removing a component, but being able to identify, test, grade and accurately describe technologically complex parts for reuse.
Reliability surveys can therefore provide another piece of information alongside dismantling data, sales history and vehicle parc trends when recyclers decide which late-model vehicles and components are worth recovering and stocking.
Lower reliability does not automatically mean better donor vehicles
At the bottom of the Driver Power reliability table, Jeep recorded a score of 81.68%, followed by MG, Cupra, Dacia and Land Rover.
However, a lower reliability score should not automatically be interpreted as stronger parts demand.
Some failures may involve components that are difficult to recover economically, while others could relate to software or electronic systems where compatibility, coding and testing requirements make reuse more complicated.
The residual value of the vehicle also matters. If repair costs exceed the value of the car, owners may choose replacement rather than repair, potentially pushing more vehicles into salvage or end-of-life channels.
For recyclers, that can create both an incoming vehicle opportunity and a challenge: the value of the donor vehicle depends on whether there is sufficient demand for the recoverable components.
Reliability is one part of the stock-buying picture
Professional recyclers are already making increasingly data-led decisions about which vehicles to purchase, dismantle and retain for parts.
Reliability information can contribute to that process, but it needs to be considered alongside parc size, accident frequency, parts enquiries, current stock levels and actual sales data.
A highly reliable model with hundreds of thousands of examples on UK roads may ultimately provide a stronger recycled parts market than a less reliable model with a much smaller vehicle population.
The Driver Power findings therefore provide useful background intelligence rather than a definitive guide to which vehicles recyclers should buy.
What they do underline is the increasingly diverse nature of the UK vehicle parc.
As traditional combustion vehicles, hybrids and fully electric cars continue to age together, professional recyclers will need an increasingly detailed understanding of which vehicles remain in service, which components fail or become damaged, and which recovered parts are commercially viable for reuse.
For an industry built around extracting maximum value from end-of-life and salvage vehicles, that knowledge is becoming every bit as important as the dismantling process itself.
Source: Auto Express – Driver Power 2026, “Most and least reliable car manufacturers 2026”
Further Reading on ATF Professional
-
Green Parts and the Future of Fleet Repairs
-
Investing in the Future of Green Parts
-
Partnership with The Green Parts Specialists helps Europcar Mobility Group UK Avoid More Than 122 Tonnes of Carbon Emissions YTD
-
Allianz Supports Apprentices with Vehicle Repair Charity Project
